*LAS NOTICIAS CON LA MONT* 📰
📃 *Premio Internacional Periodismo Y Periodismo Migrante*📃
La Información Directa a tu Celular 📲 de HOY *Martes 3 de Octubre 2023* *En El Plano Nacional e Internacional*:
*Ahora también ya estamos en la redes y síguenos a través de nuestros siguientes medios:*
– *TikTok*: https://www.tiktok.com/@federicolamontoficial?_t=8fbL5yfdiiM&_r=1
*YouTube:* https://www.youtube.com/@FedericoLamontTv
*Instagram:* https://instagram.com/federicolamontoficial?utm_source=qr&igshid=ZDc4ODBmNjlmNQ%3D%3D
*Twitter:* https://twitter.com/federicolamont_?t=1JFGx2rnaadYGDPKxR_jpA&s=09
*Colaboración Especial En:* http://MexicoTodayUSA.com
*Biden to Deliver Oval Office Address as He Seeks Aid for Israel and Ukraine*
President Biden is expected to ask Congress to approve about $100 billion in emergency funds to arm Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan and fortify the U.S.-Mexico border.
President Biden will deliver a prime-time speech on Thursday about the war in Ukraine and the terror attacks in Israel as his administration prepares to call on Congress to approve tens of billions of dollars in military aid for the two embattled nations.
The address will mark the second time Mr. Biden has delivered formal remarks from the Oval Office since becoming president. In June, he spoke from behind the Resolute Desk about a bipartisan agreement to avoid defaulting on the nation’s debt, an agreement that Republicans in the House later abandoned.
In Thursday’s speech, Mr. Biden will address the American response to the two grave struggles that he has said threaten democratic stability across the globe: the war that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year and the one that started this month after the brutal assault by Hamas on Israel on Oct. 7.
A senior White House official said Mr. Biden will seek to present the American people a broadly framed explanation for why two wars half a world away are critical to the national security of the United States.
The official, who asked not to be identified in order to discuss planning for the president’s speech, said the purpose of the address is for the president to reflect on the events of recent weeks in Israel and the 600 days that Ukraine has been fighting since Russia’s invasion.
In a whirlwind visit to Israel on Tuesday, Mr. Biden said he would soon “ask the United States Congress for an unprecedented support package for Israel’s defense.” He said the request would help supply Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system with the ammunition it needs to protect Israelis from missiles.
*Thomas L. Friedman on Israel’s ‘Morally Impossible Situation’*
What kind of war should we expect in the weeks to come?
This week, the Opinion columnist and former New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief Thomas L. Friedman joins the “Matter of Opinion” hosts to discuss the rapidly evolving situation in the Middle East and the mistakes that led to this moment. (He’s looking at you, Benjamin Netanyahu.)
(A full transcript of the episode will be available midday on the Times website.)
*Biden’s Aid, and Pointed Advice, to Israel*
To the Editor:
Re “U.S. Backs Israel, as Cause of Blast Remains Disputed” and “Biden Urges Caution in War on Hamas” (front page, Oct. 19):
President Biden offers good advice that one hopes will be heard by all: Do not let shock, pain and rage lead to counterproductive decisions, decisions that cause unnecessary loss of innocent life and squander the world’s sympathy.
Palestinians and Israelis have each been failed by their leaders. Palestinians and Israelis have each suffered unspeakable harm.
We pray that Palestinians and Israelis and their respective leaders and all of the people who empathize with them will remember that in the midst of righteous anger, ill-conceived actions can make matters much, much worse for everyone.
Ron Boyer
Eugene, Ore.
To the Editor:
As an American Jew, I am horrified by President Biden’s response to Hamas’s horrific murder of Israelis on Oct. 7. By providing military aid to Israel, the U.S. government is fueling the Israeli government’s vastly disproportionate response, in which it has already killed more Palestinian civilians than Israeli civilians were killed by Hamas.
Mr. Biden may have urged the Israeli people not to be consumed by the rage they feel about the Hamas terror attacks, but that statement is completely contradicted by his sending the very weapons that the Israeli military is using to kill civilians.
The U.S. can stop this immoral violence, but instead is fanning the flames by providing support for the autocratic Israeli government. I am joined by many other American Jews in condemning the Israeli government’s killing of thousands and threatening millions of innocent lives in the name of the Jewish people.
Miriam Shakow
Narberth, Pa.
To the Editor:
In this time of unbelievable misery and loss, it may be naïve to talk about international law. But some of the participants in the current fighting in Israel (and their allies) have represented that they are trying to respect the laws of war. Since many observers may not be familiar with those laws, I write simply to report two indisputable principles.
First, the same rules of conduct apply to the “aggressor” and to its victims. “They started it” is no excuse for doing things that would otherwise be illegal.
Second, the fact that the overall objective is permissible (like self-defense) or even laudatory does not excuse using methods that result in disproportionate harm to civilians.
Applying these principles, it is a violation of the laws of war to knowingly cut off food, water, fuel and medical supplies to entire trapped localities. The harm would fall disproportionately on civilians who have even less access to whatever supplies exist than those in authority. It cannot be justified.
Lea Brilmayer
Branford, Conn.
The writer is an emeritus professor of international law at Yale University.
To the Editor:
As an American Israeli living in Israel with a son in the Israel Defense Forces, I feel that I must speak out.
It was uplifting for Israelis to hear President Biden’s remarks after the attacks on Oct. 7. Israelis everywhere felt encouraged by the president’s unequivocal support, and the unambiguous message that the events of Oct. 7 constituted “pure, unadulterated evil” — because they truly did.
It is clear to Israelis that in carrying out these atrocities, Hamas was seeking to draw Israel into precisely the actions that Israel is now engaged in. The justification for those actions could be debated endlessly, but the world must know that Israel considers itself in existential peril. And in our hour of trial, we derive incredible strength from American support.
The objective of Israel’s war with Hamas is not the suffering of Gazans or Palestinians but the crippling of a murderous terrorist organization that has caused unprecedented suffering for Israelis and Palestinians alike.
David Gilmore
Holon, Israel
How to Unify, and Save, the Country
To the Editor:
These are unprecedented times. Democracy, national security and the world order are at stake. Our nation has never been so divided.
While our young experiment in democracy faces a challenge to its very existence, our world faces heightened conflict from dangerous leaders who present existential threats, and our planet faces increased temperature extremes, violent destructive storms and devastating wildfires.
Considering all that is at stake, our nation must find its way to tamp down the noise from the extreme sides of both parties, the disinformation promulgated by partisan media and the contempt for others fueled by social media.
I propose a unique approach to ensure the continued success of our republic. As much as I respect and admire Vice President Kamala Harris, I would ask that for the greater good of our nation and the world, she step aside as President Biden selects a moderate Republican (such as Larry Hogan, the former Maryland governor) as his 2024 running mate.
Not only would this virtually guarantee his re-election, but it would also be a giant step in uniting the country.
Bradley S. Feuer
Wellington, Fla.
Sadly, CBC Ends a Time-Honored Tradition
To the Editor:
Re “After 84 Years, Time Abruptly Runs Out on Canadian Radio Tradition” (news article, Oct. 18):
CBC’s dropping of its 84-year tradition of announcing the precise time at 1 p.m. day in and day out may seem like a trivial matter in the current world environment. But find me a Canadian who cannot finish the sentence “The beginning of the long dash …” (for the non-Canadian readers: “indicates exactly 1 o’clock Eastern Standard Time”).
It’s as common as eight months of winter and hockey, and always saying “I’m sorry.”
It was enough of a collective jolt when the middle of the announcement (“following 10 seconds of silence”) was abandoned. We grew up counting down that 10 seconds of radio silence while at the ready to instantly adjust our watches if necessary. And now we are completely on our own.
Go easy on us, world, if the lone Canadian invited to the party is now always early or late. We’re sorry.
Mary E. Campbell
Ottawa
Over-the-Counter Medicines
To the Editor:
Re “We’ve Known for 20 Years This Cold Medicine Doesn’t Work,” by Randy C. Hatton and Leslie Hendeles (Opinion guest essay, Oct. 1):
Nonprescription, over-the-counter (O.T.C.) medicines are a cornerstone of our nation’s health care system, yet your essay draws sweeping conclusions and disregards decades of regulatory oversight, scientific review, and real-world evidence supporting their safety and efficacy.
Phenylephrine, the only O.T.C. oral decongestant available without purchase restrictions, has decades of use as a safe and effective option for temporary nasal congestion relief. The Food and Drug Administration has twice determined phenylephrine to be “generally recognized as safe and effective,” the regulatory standard for O.T.C. medicines.
However, the authors’ assessment discounts this history, and other evidence, while elevating their own limited research. No medicine works equally for everyone, and every medicine has unique considerations for therapeutic selection. Providing Americans with options that offer freedom of choice for personal health care needs is a core attribute of our health care system.
Consumers can have confidence in their O.T.C. medicines, and the regulatory framework that oversees them.
Scott Melville
Washington
The writer is president and C.E.O. of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association.
*Javier Milei, a ‘Mini-Trump,’ Could Be Argentina’s Next President*
The global far-right movement faces an important test in Argentina’s election on Sunday.
He made his name disparaging people on television. He levels harsh attacks against critics online. He sports an unruly hairdo that has become a meme. And he is now the leader of his country’s far right.
Donald J. Trump, and his rise to the American presidency in 2016, shares some striking similarities with the man behind the moment unfolding in Argentina, the nation’s new political sensation, Javier Milei.
Mr. Milei, a libertarian economist and television pundit, was once seen as a sideshow in Argentina’s presidential race, not taken seriously by the news media or his opponents. Now — after a brash, outsider campaign based on a promise that he alone can fix the nation’s deep economic woes — he is the favorite to win the election outright on Sunday or head to a runoff next month.
Mr. Milei, 52, has already upended the politics of this nation of 46 million. His pledges to eliminate Argentina’s central bank and ditch its currency for the U.S. dollar have dominated the national conversation, while also helping to fuel a further collapse in the value of the Argentine peso.
But it has been his bellicose political style that has attracted comparisons with Mr. Trump, as well as widespread concern in Argentina and beyond about the damage his government could inflict on Latin America’s third-largest economy.
Mr. Milei has attacked the press and the pope; declared climate change part of “the socialist agenda”; called China, Argentina’s second-largest trade partner, an “assassin”; pledged looser controls on guns; claimed he is the victim of voter fraud; questioned the most recent presidential elections in the United States and Brazil; and suggested that the far-right riots that followed those votes were leftist plots.
“He is quite clearly a mini-Trump,” said Federico Finchelstein, an Argentine who chairs the history department at the New School in New York and studies the far right around the world.
Mr. Milei, Mr. Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s former president, are all leading practitioners of the modern strain of far-right politics, Mr. Finchelstein said, marked by vulgarity, attacks on institutions, discrediting of the news media, distrust of science, a cult of personality and narcissism.
“Trump is an icon of this new form of extreme populism,” Mr. Finchelstein said. “And Milei wants to emulate him.”
Mr. Milei has embraced comparisons to Mr. Trump, whom he has called “one of the best presidents in the history of the United States.” He has worn “Make Argentina Great Again” hats and, much like Mr. Trump, waged his campaign largely on social media. And in the two months before Sunday’s vote, he granted an interview to one American broadcast personality: the former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
Mr. Milei’s campaign declined repeated requests for an interview with The New York Times.
With two master’s degrees in economics, Mr. Milei can sound professorial at times, opining on monetary policy and a strain of libertarianism he follows called anarcho-capitalism.
He has called the state “a criminal organization” that collects taxes “at gunpoint.” And he says he is driven by a mission to shrink government and remove it from people’s lives, starting with Argentina’s central bank.
His libertarian ideals have also made him less conservative on some social issues. He has said that as long as the state doesn’t have to pay for it, he could support drug legalization, open immigration, sex work, transgender rights, same-sex marriage and selling organs.
Abortion, however, he calls “murder” and promises to put it to a referendum in Argentina, where it has been legal since 2020.
Mr. Milei surprised pollsters in August when he won Argentina’s open primaries with about 30 percent of the vote. He has since led his two main challengers in the polls: Sergio Massa, Argentina’s center-left economy minister; and Patricia Bullrich, a right-wing former security minister.
Mr. Milei has received nearly blanket news coverage during the campaign, both for his radical economic proposals and his eccentric personality. He is a self-proclaimed tantric-sex teacher with five cloned mastiff dogs. His girlfriend is a professional impersonator of one of his political archrivals. And his campaign manager and chief political adviser is his sister.
Like Mr. Trump, he speaks about the importance of image, telling Mr. Carlson that his past as a semipro soccer goalie and a singer in a Rolling Stones cover band “make for an attractive television product.” Mr. Milei makes nearly the same furrowed-brow, pursed-lip look for every selfie with voters, also calling to mind Mr. Trump.
Mr. Milei’s signature look — a leather jacket, an untamable mop of hair and long sideburns — is designed to conjure the comic-book character Wolverine, according to Lilia Lemoine, a professional cosplay performer who is Mr. Milei’s stylist and is running for Congress on his ticket. Because, like Wolverine, she said, “he is an antihero.”
The result is a cultlike following. At a recent event in Salta, a city in Argentina’s mountainous northwest, Mr. Milei rode in a truck bed as thousands of voters pushed in for a closer look. Supporters wore messy wigs, passed out fake $100 bills with his face and displayed art of his dogs, four of which are named for conservative economists.
“Yes, everyone describes him as crazy, for everything, but who better than a crazy person to move the country forward?” said María Luisa Mamani, 57, a butcher-shop owner. “Because the sane ones didn’t do anything.”
*Setback for Sunak as Conservatives Are Trounced in Two Local Elections*
Britain’s Labour party overturned large majorities in two parliamentary elections, underlining its revival in an ominous sign for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
Britain’s governing Conservative Party on Friday lost two of its safest parliamentary seats in a significant and ominous setback for the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, who must call a general election that will decide his fate within the next 15 months.
Voting in the Conservative strongholds of Mid Bedfordshire and Tamworth took place on Thursday to replace two of the party’s lawmakers — one of whom quit after an allegation of sexual assault — and came as Britain’s health care system faces acute strain and its economy stagnates amid high inflation.
While that was always likely to put the Conservatives under pressure, the double defeat in the party’s heartlands was a stunning blow to Mr. Sunak and a striking success for the opposition Labour Party and its leader, Keir Starmer.
In Tamworth, northeast of Birmingham, Labour overturned a majority of almost 20,000 in the last general election to win narrowly, while in Mid Bedfordshire, around 50 miles north of London, the main opposition party overcame an even bigger deficit to seize the seat.
Mr. Starmer described the vote as “a phenomenal result that shows Labour is back in the service of working people and redrawing the political map.”
In a statement, he added: “To those who have given us their trust, and those considering doing so, Labour will spend every day acting in your interests and focused on your priorities. Labour will give Britain its future back.”
Analysts caution against over-interpreting these types of local contests — known as by-elections — where there is no prospect of the result changing the government, and voters often cast their ballots to register a protest against the governing party. Less than 36 percent of registered voters turned out to vote in Tamworth; in Mid Bedfordshire the number was higher, at 44 per cent.
Because the Conservatives won so convincingly in the last general election, in 2019, Labour has an electoral mountain to climb if it is to win a clear majority the next time Britons are asked to decide who should govern them.
Yet, the scale of the switch of votes revealed on Friday does not bode well for Mr. Sunak, suggesting that even some of his Conservative Party’s more secure strongholds are no longer impregnable. It will also increase Mr. Starmer’s confidence that, having shifted his party to the political center ground, he can win an outright majority in the next general election.
“This isn’t destiny, but it is a pointer that unless the Conservatives can fairly dramatically and fairly radically turn things around, then they are, in truth, staring defeat in the face in 12 months’ time,” John Curtice, a professor at the University of Strathclyde and a leading polling expert, told the BBC early Friday.
The first result to be declared was from Tamworth, where voters were choosing a successor to Chris Pincher, the former Conservative lawmaker who had represented the district. He resigned from Parliament after a drunken incident in which, it was alleged, he had groped two men.
In the last general election in 2019, Mr. Pincher won with a majority of 19,634, but on Friday that was overturned when the Labour candidate, Sarah Edwards, won 11,719 votes, and the Conservative candidate, Andrew Cooper, 10,403.
“Tonight the people of Tamworth have voted for Labour’s positive vision and a fresh start,” Ms. Edwards told her cheering supporters after the result. “They have sent a clear message to Rishi Sunak and the Conservatives that they have had enough of this failed government.”
Support for Brexit was strong in Tamworth, and Labour’s victory will encourage it to think it is winning back voters who had deserted it for the Conservatives because they favored Britain’s exit from the European Union.
In Mid Bedfordshire the contest was to replace Nadine Dorries, a former cabinet minister and prominent supporter of Boris Johnson, who quit as prime minister last year. Ms. Dorries announced her intention to leave Parliament in June when Mr. Johnson stood down as a lawmaker, but she caused confusion by delaying her formal resignation and faced accusations of absenteeism and failing to represent local voters.
In the 2019 general election, Ms. Dorries won a majority of 24,664 over Labour, and the Conservatives had represented the district since 1931.
That ended on Friday when Labour’s candidate, Alistair Strathern, won 13,872 votes, the Conservatives came second with 12,680, and the smaller, centrist Liberal Democrats won 9,420.
Both results were a stinging blow to Mr. Sunak, who, since he became prime minister last year following the brief and disastrous leadership of Liz Truss, has failed to close a persistent double-digit deficit in the opinion polls against the opposition Labour Party.
Mr. Sunak was praised for restoring some measure of stability after Ms. Truss’s economic plans roiled the financial markets and she became the country’s shortest-lived prime minister in history. But he has struggled to win over the British public after 13 years of Conservative government.
In recent weeks, Mr. Sunak has tried to seize the political initiative with a series of eye-catching decisions: scaling back climate change targets, canceling the second phase of a high-speed rail project, announcing new measures to phase out the sale of cigarettes to young people and proposing a shake-up to the high school examination system.
Little electoral reward appears to have flowed from these announcements, however, three of which were made at the Conservative Party’s annual conference in Manchester earlier this month.
That meeting was distracted by a high-profile appearance by Ms. Truss, and by scarcely concealed jockeying from those who see themselves as contenders for the party leadership, should the Conservatives lose the general election.
*What El Niño Means for This Winter’s Weather*
Forecasters at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said this week they expect a warmer winter in the North and a wetter one across the South.
Temperatures are likely to be above average this winter across most of the northern tier of the United States, including in the Northeast and much of the West Coast, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said on Thursday in its seasonal forecast.
But a slightly warmer winter doesn’t necessarily mean there is going to be less snow. A strong El Niño is expected to be the driving force behind the overall forecast this winter, pushing temperatures above normal across much of the country and raising precipitation levels in the southern United States, particularly the Southeast.
The outlook, from the Climate Prediction Center at NOAA, comes after the winter of 2022-23 was the second-warmest ever in the Northeast, and after New York City’s first measurable snow of the season arrived later than ever recorded. Though warmer temperatures may prevail again in the Northeast, more nor’easters could hit major East Coast cities this winter.
El Niño also could bring wetter-than-average conditions across California, a year after parts of the state received over 20 inches of rain and experienced landslides, heavy snow and blizzard conditions that stranded some residents and tourists for days.
“There is some hope for snow lovers,” Jon Gottschalck, chief of the operational prediction branch of the Climate Prediction Center, told reporters on Thursday.
But this is likely to be the case only in some places.
Northeast: Forecasts are leaning toward a warmer-than-average winter, particularly farther north, into New England. Most of the Northeast is likely to have normal precipitation. Still, forecasters believe that above-average precipitation is likely along the Interstate-95 corridor, including the Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York and Boston areas. This increased precipitation is likely to come in the form of major storms along the East Coast.
South: Above-average precipitation is likely across the region, easing drought from Texas to Tennessee, with higher confidence among forecasters of increased precipitation in Florida. Despite the strong El Niño influence, which would typically bring cooler temperatures to the region, forecasters believe there is an equal chance that temperatures will be above or below average.
Great Lakes: After a winter of big lake-effect snow events, including the fourth-snowiest day ever in Buffalo, forecasters believe a season of below-average precipitation is in store this year. Temperatures are expected to be above average, which will probably mean less snow.
Southern Plains and Southern Rockies: There is at least some indication that precipitation will be above normal and that there could be an increase in snowfall. Temperatures are expected to be near normal.
Midwest, Northern Plains and Northern Rockies: Temperatures are likely to be above average across the northern tier of the country. Parts of the Midwest and the Northern Plains could have below-average precipitation, including less snow. Across the Northern Rockies, drier conditions are more likely and drought could continue.
Northwest: Precipitation may stay near normal levels, but there is a strong indication that temperatures will be above average.
Southwest: Temperatures are expected to be above average, especially across Southern California and Nevada, where forecast models are calling for slightly above-average precipitation.
Alaska and Hawaii: Temperatures are likely to be above average. Precipitation could be above average in Alaska’s northern tier. Drought is expected to persist in Hawaii, as below-average precipitation is likely.
Believe the forecast, but with a grain of road salt.
When meteorologists produce these forecasts, they are giving an educated probability that temperatures and precipitation will be above or below average. But if there is a 20 percent chance that temperatures will be above average, that doesn’t mean that there won’t be a record-breaking cold outbreak. Likewise, if a dry winter is expected, that doesn’t mean that there won’t be a blockbuster snowstorm.
Last year, forecasters predicted that California’s winter would be warmer and drier than average. But the Southwest was hit with cooler temperatures and back-to-back atmospheric rivers, inundating the region with precipitation. To be fair to the forecasters, seasonally unpredictable conditions like these can occur in any season.
El Niño will drive weather patterns.
The stronger an El Niño event, the more likely it is to affect temperature and precipitation across the globe because it influences the jet stream, a swift river of wind at a level of the atmosphere where airplanes often cruise. During North America’s winter months, it plays a major role in separating warm and cool air masses, all while steering storms from the Pacific across the continent. The change in the jet stream’s position will have a considerable effect on the weather that occurs across the United States.
Forecasters caution, though, that there are many other factors at play: The Arctic Oscillation, for example, can cause a sudden Arctic outbreak that allows for nor’easters to develop, or the Madden-Julian Oscillation could increase the amount of precipitation in the Northwest.
Then there is the influence of climate change, which meteorologists take into account when making their forecasts. “Winter is one of the warmest, fastest warming seasons for many places across the country,” Tom Di Liberto, a NOAA climate scientist, said.
*Fallece Carlos Romero Deschamps, exlíder del Sindicato de Pemex*
El otrora líder petrolero Carlos Romero Deschamps falleció a los 79 años, según confirmaron fuentes cercanas.
El exlíder del Sindicato de Trabajadores Petroleros de la República Mexicana (STPRM), Carlos Antonio Romero Deschamps, falleció este jueves 19 de octubre a los 79 años, confirmaron fuentes cercanas al también exsenador priista.
Romero, quien renunció a su cargo en octubre de 2019, era originario de Tampico, Tamaulipas, y fue electo por primera vez el 25 de junio de 1993, en sustitución de Sebastián Guzmán Cabrera, quien estuvo al frente del sindicato a la caída de Joaquín Hernández Galicia, La Quina, en enero de 1989. Desde su renuncia, cuatro años antes de la conclusión de su último periodo al frente del STPRM, Romero se mantuvo alejado de toda actividad política.
El otrora líder llegó a Pemex a los 26 años, cuando fue contratado como chófer de pipa y fue hasta los 76 que anunció su salida de uno de los sindicatos más grandes y poderosos de América. Según datos, el STPRM tiene casi 100 mil afiliados que gozan de las mejores condiciones de trabajo del sector.
PERFIL: Carlos Romero Deschamps
Carlos Romero Deschamps (1944-2023) fue uno de los personajes más relevantes de la historia política y sindical del México reciente. Nació en Tampico, Tamaulipas (al norte del país), donde estudió la carrera de Contaduría en la Escuela Bancaria y Comercial.
A los 26 años, el exlíder sindical llegó a la paraestatal petrolera donde fue contratado como chófer, y escaló hasta el Sindicato de Trabajadores Petroleros de la República Mexicana. Ahí se mantuvo por casi 30 años. Deschamps se unió a las filas del Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) al cual representó en la Cámara de Diputados y Senadores.
Comparto con ustedes mi columna en El Universal, mucho agradeceré su difusión
No debemos olvidar que estos 13 fideicomisos se suman a los 109 que desaparecieron en 2020 y cuya eliminación perjudicó a la ciencia, la educación, el arte, la cultura, la atención al cáncer y a los desastres naturales. Ahora esta decisión también viola la seguridad social de los trabajadores del poder judicial, que ven como se esfuman -por mandato de un solo hombre y complicidad de las bancadas legislativas afines al oficialismo-, sus derechos a prestaciones por las que han trabajado durante muchas décadas.
Es falso que estos fideicomisos estén destinados para beneficiar a los ministros en funciones o en retiro. Son corruptos los que utilizan información tendenciosa. Cada fondo tiene objetivos específicos que no permiten un uso distinto para el que fueron creados.
Y mientras el ataque artero va contra estos fideicomisos, los de los militares aumentan peligrosamente. Un día después de que los diputados morenistas y aliados festejaran el golpe al poder judicial, aprueban un fideicomiso “turístico” para el tren maya, manejado por el ejército. Hay que recordar que en lo que va de esta administración, los recursos de estos fideicomisos han aumentado en 1,048%. ¡Que contentos deben estar el General Luis Cresencio Sandoval y el recién condecorado y exonerado General Salvador Cienfuegos!
*ATENTAMENTE*
*MAESTRO FEDERICO LA MONT*
Sent from my iPod
Mexico Today USA 